Skip to main content

Email correspondence: Comment for the Plan for Water Hydrology TM Historic Data - Dianna Suarez

From: Jennifer Hanson
Sent: Tuesday, March 7, 2023 2:24 PM
To: Dianna Suarez  
Cc: Ricki Heck <>; Karen Hull <>; Susan Lauer <>

Subject: RE: Comment for the Plan for Water Hydrology TM Historic Data 

Hi Dianna, I apologize for the delay in responding to your comments.

Please see the attached. Responses are in red. Please let me know if you have any questions.

Thank you,


 NID General Manager



From: Dianna Suarez  
Sent: Sunday, February 5, 2023 8:14 PM
To: Jennifer Hanson <>
Cc: Ricki Heck <>; Karen Hull <>
Subject: Comment for the Plan for Water Hydrology TM Historic Data


Dear Jennifer Hanson and All, 

Please find my comments (attached) for the Water Demand and Supply model inputs for the next stages of the Plan for Water from "Historic Data".  Also attached is the Nov 12, 2020 Staff Report for the 3 Hydrology TMs that were the basis for the last UWMP and RWMP.  The problems with these analyses were documented at that time, and promises were made to correct the inaccuracies and relate the issues to the Plan for Water.  Many questions were referred to the "Plan for Water at a future date".  The time has come.

Also attached is the Staff Report containing the 3 technical memos.  Starting on page 211 of the third memo are the many questions generated by these TMs.  The answers to these questions fall short of what is needed for an in-depth and accurate analysis.  I have commented on several of the answers and request that the Plan for Water address these issues.  Finally, I comment specifically on the notorious Table 3.1 of the Water Supply Analysis Technical Memorandum.  Thank you for your time and attention to this comment, and the good work being done for this analysis.  Dianna Suarez


Join our mailing list